
3 stripes out for Adidas
This case study focuses on the battle fought by Adidas to protect its mark in the form of three stripes, exploring the implications of the historical as well as more recent decisions of the court.
A Section 2(e)(3) refusal is issued when the USPTO determines the applied-for mark is geographically deceptively misdescriptive: it contains a geographic term that falsely implies the goods originate from a particular location when they do not, and consumers would consider that geographic origin to be a material characteristic of the goods.
"True Tuscan" for olive oil not produced in Tuscany, or "Paris Star" for clothing not made in France, are examples. The mark implies a geographic origin that is both false and material; consumers who care about Tuscan olive oil or French fashion would be misled.
A Section 2(e)(3) refusal is significantly harder to overcome than a Section 2(e)(2) refusal and cannot be resolved through acquired distinctiveness. Once a mark is determined to be geographically deceptively misdescriptive, it is permanently unregistrable on either register.
Does receiving an office action mean my trademark is denied?
Can I amend my trademark application in response to an office action?
How long does it take for the USPTO to review my response to an office action?
What is a suspension letter in context of trademark office actions?
Is there any other solution to an office action besides responding?
What does it mean if a trademark is 'published for oppositions'?
Our team of experienced trademark attorneys is here to help you! Simply send us an email outlining your request and we'll be happy to assist you.