How is "acquired distinctiveness" in trademark law evaluated?

Photo of Jan Buza

Written by Jan Buza

Co-founder of Trama

Acquired distinctiveness is evaluated based on the evidence the applicant submits demonstrating that the mark has developed a secondary meaning among consumers. The most commonly assessed factors are:

  • Length and exclusivity of use: how long the mark has been in continuous and exclusive use in connection with the goods or services.
  • Volume of sales and advertising: the extent of commercial activity under the mark.
  • Consumer recognition: direct evidence, such as consumer surveys, showing that consumers associate the mark with a specific source.
  • Media coverage: press references that identify the mark as a brand rather than a generic term.
  • Third-party recognition: industry publications and awards referencing the mark as a brand.
  • Intentional copying: evidence that competitors have deliberately copied the mark, which implies recognition of its source-identifying function.

A continuous and exclusive use period of at least five years supports a claim of acquired distinctiveness, though this alone is rarely sufficient. Supporting evidence strengthens the claim significantly.

Advice icon

Haven't found what you are looking for?

Our team of experienced trademark attorneys is here to help you! Simply send us an email outlining your request and we'll be happy to assist you.