Acquired distinctiveness is evaluated based on the evidence the applicant submits demonstrating that the mark has developed a secondary meaning among consumers. The most commonly assessed factors are:
- Length and exclusivity of use: how long the mark has been in continuous and exclusive use in connection with the goods or services.
- Volume of sales and advertising: the extent of commercial activity under the mark.
- Consumer recognition: direct evidence, such as consumer surveys, showing that consumers associate the mark with a specific source.
- Media coverage: press references that identify the mark as a brand rather than a generic term.
- Third-party recognition: industry publications and awards referencing the mark as a brand.
- Intentional copying: evidence that competitors have deliberately copied the mark, which implies recognition of its source-identifying function.
A continuous and exclusive use period of at least five years supports a claim of acquired distinctiveness, though this alone is rarely sufficient. Supporting evidence strengthens the claim significantly.