How can I overcome the "merely descriptive" refusal from the USPTO?

Photo of Jan Buza

Written by Jan Buza

Co-founder of Trama

The main strategies are arguing that the mark is suggestive rather than descriptive, demonstrating acquired distinctiveness, or amending to the Supplemental Register.

Suggestiveness: if the mark requires imagination, thought, or inference to connect it to the goods rather than directly describing them, it is suggestive and registrable. This argument works best where the connection between the mark and the goods is indirect or requires a mental leap.

Acquired distinctiveness: submit evidence that the mark has been in long and exclusive use and consumers now associate it with a single commercial source. Evidence includes sales figures, advertising expenditure, length of use, consumer surveys, and third-party recognition.

Supplemental Register: if the mark is descriptive but has some commercial recognition, it can be registered on the Supplemental Register while building toward Principal Register eligibility.

Start with a free assessment of your office action with Trama.

Advice icon

Haven't found what you are looking for?

Our team of experienced trademark attorneys is here to help you! Simply send us an email outlining your request and we'll be happy to assist you.