Back to Oppositions

Given the high risk of opposition for my trademark, should I continue with this brand, or try to rebrand?

Senior Trademark Attorney

There is no universal answer; it depends on how embedded the brand is and how serious the conflict is.

If the brand is in early development and the conflicting mark is strong and directly overlapping, rebranding before the mark builds commercial recognition is significantly cheaper than facing opposition proceedings and potentially losing. The earlier in the process this decision is made, the lower the cost.

If the brand already has established commercial recognition and the conflicting mark's owner has not actively enforced against similar uses, a co-existence agreement may be achievable without rebranding. Some holders of earlier marks are open to consent arrangements where the commercial contexts are genuinely different.

The decision should be based on a clear-eyed assessment of the opposition risk, the strength of the defense available, and what rebranding would cost commercially relative to the cost of defending the application.

Related questions

Stories of our clients: Take on Goliath

“A lot of businesses focus on the product: what's good about the product, what makes the product so different, the unique selling proposition. You hear these phrases all the time. Take On Goliath looks at things a little differently. We go far enough back to see what's needed to support the consumer, the retailer, the wholesaler, and then the brand itself.” Read the full story of Dave Christie, the founder of Take on Goliath, another inspiring brand protected by Trama that helps SME businesses be seen and heard more.

Taylor Swift's brand strategy: song lyrics as trademarks

Immensely famous pop star Taylor Swift does not only hold countless number of awards and musical praise, but also an impressive portfolio of trademarks. As she continues to trademark her most popular phrases, she ensures the continuous growth of her brand and her legacy.