Medion AG v. Hong Kong Netease Interactive Entertainment Limited

Medion AG

Case details

Plaintiff: Medion AG

Case no.: R0557/2022-5

Jurisdiction: European Union

Industry: Technology

Decision date: 20 Dec, 2022


The additional element ‘After’ at the end of the contested sign, is not sufficient to safely exclude the existence of a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR from a significant part of the Spanish-speaking part of the relevant public for the contested goods which have been found identical with the earlier goods.

Comparison of Trademarks



Related articles